The questionnaire consisted of step three pieces. Region I integrated questions out-of socio-market research (years, level of knowledge, parity, familial earnings, field, most recent CuteAsianWoman-datering marital reputation, sexual activity, history of HPV inoculation, and you may reputation of unusual cervical cancer tests).
Region II composed of 6 questions relating to the mark women that should be processed, years first off, volume, many years or criteria to avoid regarding evaluating, and techniques regarding screening. Only the professionals who had have you ever heard out of HPV do just do it in order to Part III and this examined understanding of HPV out of the types of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), form of signal and you will protection.
Prior to the analysis, the fresh survey away from part II and you may area III from inside the Thai variation were considered, discussed, and revised up to opinion among 20 scientists who were the gynecologic oncologists (specific was basically people in other parallel knowledge). The pros rated every one of 19 issues since either ‘relevant’ or ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-top Posts Authenticity Index (I-CVI) is determined per items, plus the Content Authenticity List (CVI) try computed by firmly taking an average proportion from 14 questions relating to information about cervical cancer tumors evaluating and you can 5 questions relating to HPV. The new CVI have been 1 both for elements of this new questionnaire (S1 Table). This new accuracy are checked-out when you look at the 30 women with the exact same characteristic because the members. New Cronbach’ leader coefficients on the precision were 0.819 getting understanding of cervical cancer tumors examination and 0.907 to own understanding of HPV.
Towards big date out of arranged colposcopy, the analysis assistant considering suggestions of the data toward female exactly who met inclusion requirements. The women who wanted to engage gave authored advised concur and you may replied the new survey by themselves by themselves in advance of proceeding to help you colposcopy.
Study obtained for it studies had been socio-group study (Area I of the questionnaire), expertise in cervical cancers evaluation (Part II), and expertise in HPV (Area III).
The fresh answers of real information in the cervical cancer screening and HPV was basically analyzed by for each items before rating categorization. Proper respond to was obtained once the step 1 whereas ‘wrong and being unsure of answer’ try scored 0.
Away from 14 issues out-of cervical cancer tests, feminine whoever score were ? 10 had been arbitrarily categorized as the having ‘a beneficial knowledge’ usually was regarded as which have “negative training”. Having knowledge of HPV, women whoever answer try ‘never heard about HPV’ were omitted throughout the research off HPV studies.
Out of 5 concerns, feminine whose get have been ? step three was in fact thought to be that have ‘an excellent experience in HPV’ normally because the ‘bad knowledge’. Out-of 19 inquiries, women whoever get was in fact ? thirteen were categorized since the having ‘an effective complete knowledge’ usually while the ‘unhealthy full knowledge’.
The studies was in fact accumulated from inside the a digital databases and assessed playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Detailed analytics were used to research group investigation and was indeed summarized just like the number that have fee, indicate that have practical deviation otherwise median with variety. This new relationship ranging from for every variable and you can degree score was in fact assessed using effortless linear regression. Exploratory model was created inside the multivariable data including every variables possibly pertaining to the info rating. This new believed quantity of statistical value are a great p-worth of 0.05 otherwise quicker.
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>